Psychology and the user experience, Part Two
In the first part of the Psychology and the user experience, we discussed Weibull distributions and their application to site visit durations. In this next part, we’ll look at some psychological principles applicable to our field. The following concepts are unashamedly taken from Susan Weinschenk’s excellent article The Psychologists View of UX Design, UX Magazine:
Psychology and the user experience, Part One
In the first of two posts on psychology and the user experience, we consider a new piece of research that confirms what all web people already know: you only have seconds to make an impact. more »
Brighton UX Camp, Oct 1 2011
Despite the soaring October temperatures and clear blue skies, fifty or so committed (no jokes) UXers met for the first Brighton UX Camp at the fourth floor offices of Cogapp in Brighton.
Content Management Systems
Content Management Systems attract their fair share of criticism. Certainly, like any tool, they can be abused – but they can also work very well, allowing large teams to manage complex websites across different locations and timezones. Poor training and poor implementation is not the fault of the CMS vendor (necessarily).
But sometimes, you see some code that defies any sense. more »
Dumbing Down
I’ve recently been reviewing some remote usability test videos for one of our clients. This post isn’t about remote testing, usability tests or specific providers but the testing has thrown up some interesting findings. (Just as an aside, we use a variety of tools for the remote site tests – mainly whatusersdo.com and www.usertesting.com. Nate Bolt, co-author of Remote Research, has a great list of remote testing tools. If you’re interested, you should take a look at the Tools section at the website that accompanies the book.)
The sites I’ve been reviewing sell holidays on the water; sailing, river boats, power boats, etc. in some amazing locations. A few users had a bit of trouble with the language used on the sites, namely the words “berth” and “flotilla”. Not a huge amount of trouble but enough to worry them sufficiently for doubt to enter their minds. And doubt is not something you want to engender in customers who are preparing to spend upwards of a couple of thousand pounds.
Ways of Working
I came across a couple of great quotes on how to work with clients in my RSS stream today:
“If you do good work for good clients, it will lead to other good work for other good clients. If you do bad work for bad clients, it will lead to other bad work for other bad clients.” Michael Beirut via johnnyholland.tv
Not only does bad work lead to more bad work, it makes it increasingly difficult to argue that what you’ve been asked to do is bad.
And then from Jeffrey Zeldman (see blog post for full unedited version):
“I’ve trained my cats to think they’re in charge… Initially I feed them each half a small can of salmon… [then] I feed them each a half can of whitefish, exactly as I always intended to. They finish with gusto, convinced that they’ve won. I am so in client services.”Jeffrey Zeldman via Zeldman.com
And that’s what makes it so much fun!
On having good manners – a website Code of Conduct
User research, user experience design, user focused design; the aim is to always keep the user at the centre of the design process – and without doubt, this is an admirable goal. But always try to keep in mind – the user is a person too.
I access the internet all the time on my phone and my computer, and I never feel like a user. I feel like a personJulie Dodd, Head of UX & Design @publiczone [via currybetdotnet]
I heartily agree!
Have you ever been at a meeting where a particular solution is proposed and although many people openly admit “that really annoys me” or “I hate it when they do that”, that feature, or trick, still gets implemented? This is often excused by ‘business requirements’, or the difficulty of doing it another way. However I think the problem really lies in not having enough respect for one’s customers and for not accepting that they are real people (people who find your solution annoying).
I recently had the pleasure of seeing Dr Harry Brignull present his Dark Patterns. These dark patterns, he argues, are more than just the product of lazy designers or misguided business requirements. Dark Patterns are carefully crafted with a solid understanding of human psychology, and they do not have the user’s interests in mind.
(The Dark Patterns library is a great resource and if you haven’t been through it, you really should). Nov ’11 update: Harry’s recently been featured on A List Apart.
This started me thinking that actually, a lot of these poor experiences (whether they are deliberate or the result of laziness) are actually the result of having very little respect for your users/customers/audience. And that by having better online manners and treating people with more courtesy, we can help focus the work required to fix them.
Of course the worrying thing about dark patterns is that they have been deliberately designed to fool people (often out of their money). So heartfelt pleas aren’t likely to dissuade their creators from such practices. However, Dark Patterns is starting to have some success by publicly naming and shaming errant companies into action. See, for example, the heartening response from Audible following their listing. But maybe what we need is a more defined ‘Code of conduct’ or maybe a badge to wear with pride in our footers?
I read with interest that super model Erin O’Connor has recently been speaking out against the fashion world lying to women. Having put up with airbrushing and trickery in fashion advertising for many years, several key players have called for industry regulation against these practices. Their suggestions include kite-marking to show digital tampering or a “golden star” system rewarding the use unaltered photographs.
Whilst I don’t want to draw a comparison between poor web usability and fashion’s obsession with youth and perfection (and the harm this can do to young women), perhaps we should be looking at similar schemes that reward respectful, person-centered, website owners?
The Internet is Facebook
The always entertaining SitePoint podcast (#98) spent some time contemplating the possible demise of OpenID and the shift towards Facebook Connect.
This had me thinking; knowing the difficulty some users have in differentiating the Internet from their browser (or from their broadband provider or email for that matter), I started wondering how soon it would be before Facebook’s support department started getting calls that the Internet was broken. When an inexperienced user is clicking on Facebook buttons to log into a ‘Connect’-ed website, it’s understandable that they might start thinking that other website is Facebook.
In one of those wonderful moments of serendipity the internet offers, I then came across Ryan Carson’s post on Facebook being the Internet. How long before a major corporation does away with their .com presence and moves wholesale onto Facebook? What impact will that have on our jobs?
Mental models
For a few minutes of comic relief, I love catching up with the latest posts on clientsfromhell. Some of the stories are scarily familiar and others just plain terrifying. But there’s a category of story that is amusing because it misunderstands something so familiar to us as “computer people” that they make us see the things we do in new ways. more »
A real page turner
I was listening to the excellent I.A. Podcast with Jeff Parks the other day. In the episode titled “Working in the post-industrial era” with Dorian Taylor they spoke about many interesting subjects concerning modern working practices.
Early on in the conversation Jeff and Dorian discuss some of the drawbacks inherent in following UI metaphors too closely. Making an operating system resemble a home office certainly allows an inexperienced user to start working more quickly, but there are times that the computing power available in modern personal computers can be leveraged to process and display information in far more interesting ways. more »






